ЮРИДИЧЕСКАЯ ПРИРОДА ИНСТИТУТА ПРЕКРАЩЕНИЯ УГОЛОВНОГО ДЕЛА
Abstract
Thus, the investigator, assessing the evidence collected in the case on its internal
belief, guided by the law and conscience, concludes that
actual and legal grounds for termination of the criminal case. This result
it is a logical conclusion drawn from the analysis of objective reality, established by
sufficient set of reliable evidence. Giving this procedural
the negative colouring and elevation to the rank of minor act, and often marriage
the work of the investigator, I think, is unacceptable.
Downloads
How to Cite
Tleuova, R. S. (2019). ЮРИДИЧЕСКАЯ ПРИРОДА ИНСТИТУТА ПРЕКРАЩЕНИЯ УГОЛОВНОГО ДЕЛА. JOURNAL OF ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF JURISPRUDENCE, 56(4), 110–115. Retrieved from https://bulletin-law.kaznu.kz/index.php/journal/article/view/1720
Issue
Section
CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY