ЮРИДИЧЕСКАЯ ПРИРОДА ИНСТИТУТА ПРЕКРАЩЕНИЯ УГОЛОВНОГО ДЕЛА

  • R. S. Tleuova

Abstract

Thus, the investigator, assessing the evidence collected in the case on its internalbelief, guided by the law and conscience, concludes thatactual and legal grounds for termination of the criminal case. This resultit is a logical conclusion drawn from the analysis of objective reality, established bysufficient set of reliable evidence. Giving this proceduralthe negative colouring and elevation to the rank of minor act, and often marriagethe work of the investigator, I think, is unacceptable.
Published
2019-01-31
How to Cite
TLEUOVA, R. S.. ЮРИДИЧЕСКАЯ ПРИРОДА ИНСТИТУТА ПРЕКРАЩЕНИЯ УГОЛОВНОГО ДЕЛА. Journal of actual problems of jurisprudence, [S.l.], v. 56, n. 4, p. 110-115, jan. 2019. ISSN 2617-8362. Available at: <http://bulletin-law.kaznu.kz/index.php/journal/article/view/1720>. Date accessed: 19 mar. 2019.
Section
УГОЛОВНОЕ ПРАВО И КРИМИНАЛИСТИКА